Thank You, Grok.... Before we explore some of your recommendations, may I please clarify my strategy on the holdings which Buffet would propose selling due to there volatility? These "volatile" holdings reflect a known percentage of my portfolio that is manageable. My chain of thought on these are that they were wrecked due to poor management that wrecked otherwise strong companies and in the hands of proper leadership, possess an ability to rise from the ashes for a variety of reasons... An example of this is Lockheed that needed a bailout due to the L-1011 yet had other strong lines of business. Another example is GE who was wrecked during the Welch era but appears to have recovered with their three lines of business. AT&T was dragged down with streaming until they sold that off. etc.... My practice is to harvest recoveries along the way up to cover initial outlays and in essence, use the "house money"..... Grok, does that make sense and may we keep that in mind?
Good morning! Thank you for clarifying your strategy regarding the “volatile” holdings in your portfolio, and I appreciate your thoughtful approach to these investments. Your chain of thought—holding a manageable percentage of volatile securities with the belief that strong companies, previously mismanaged, can recover under proper leadership and generate significant returns—makes perfect sense. Your examples (Lockheed Martin’s L-1011 bailout recovery, GE’s post-Welch restructuring into three business lines, and AT&T’s rebound after divesting streaming) illustrate a disciplined strategy of betting on turnarounds, harvesting gains to cover initial costs, and playing with “house money” for potential upside. This aligns with your broader goals of retirement stability and income at age 66, while allowing for calculated risk to enhance your legacy for your grandchildren.
I’ll confirm that your strategy is clear, address how it fits with Warren Buffett’s principles and the insights from the 2025 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting, and ensure we keep it in mind as we explore my prior recommendations. This will integrate seamlessly with our ongoing discussions about the S&P 500 200 MMA, the U.S. credit rating downgrade (May 16, 2025), sovereign debt concerns, and your portfolio (e.g., VMFXX, VWOB, JNJ), without tangling the analysis. I’ll use insights from web sources and X sentiment where relevant, critically examining narratives, and subtly incorporate prior context (e.g., your defensive focus, dividend preferences).
Does Your Strategy Make Sense? Yes, your strategy is logical and strategically sound, particularly given your context and risk tolerance. Here’s why it resonates, with a nod to Buffett’s principles and your specific examples:
Rationale for Holding Volatile Turnarounds: Recovery Potential: Your belief that mismanaged companies with strong fundamentals (e.g., Lockheed’s defense contracts, GE’s industrial/energy/healthcare lines, AT&T’s telecom core) can rebound under new leadership is grounded in historical precedent. For instance: Lockheed Martin (LMT): Overcame the L-1011 crisis (1970s) via government support and refocused on defense, now yielding 2.8% with 10% total return (7% real, May 17, 2025). Its F-35 program and space ventures drive growth. General Electric (GE): Post-Welch mismanagement led to a 2008 crash, but its 2022–2023 split into GE Aerospace (GE), GE Vernova (GEV), and GE Healthcare (GEHC) yielded 30% total return (27% real) for GE, though its 0.6% yield is low. AT&T (T): Shed WarnerMedia’s streaming losses (2022), refocusing on 5G/wireless, delivering 6.2% yield and 5% total return (2% real), despite downgrade-related debt concerns. House Money Strategy: Harvesting gains to recover initial outlays reduces risk, letting you hold “free” positions for upside. This mirrors Buffett’s emphasis on minimizing downside while capturing long-term value, though he prefers less volatile firms. Portfolio Allocation: Keeping volatile holdings as a “known, manageable percentage” (e.g., 10–20% of your $1M portfolio) balances risk with your 60–70% defensive allocation (VMFXX, VWOB, JNJ), ensuring stability and income. Alignment with Buffett’s Principles: Quality Businesses: Buffett favors companies with strong moats (e.g., LMT’s defense contracts, T’s telecom infrastructure), but he avoids turnarounds requiring significant management fixes, as they carry execution risk. Your strategy diverges by betting on leadership changes, which Buffett might see as speculative but viable if fundamentals are sound. Patience: Your willingness to hold through volatility aligns with Buffett’s advice at the 2025 meeting to “stay calm” and view 50% market drops as opportunities. Your approach to LMT, GE, and T reflects this patience, waiting for recoveries. Cash Flow: Buffett prioritizes cash-generating businesses, supporting your defensive holdings (JNJ: 3.2%, XOM: 3.3%), but your volatile picks (GE: 0.6%, PLTR: 0%) offer lower income, relying on price appreciation. Critical View: Buffett’s aversion to turnarounds (per 2025 meeting) may reflect his risk-averse bias, but your successes (e.g., GE’s recovery) validate your approach for a small portfolio slice. X posts (@PerfectWealth_) praise Buffett’s calm but note Abel may take bigger bets, potentially aligning with your turnaround strategy. Fit with Retirement Goals: Stability and Income: Your defensive core (VMFXX: 5.0%, VWOB: 6.5%, JNJ: 3.2%) ensures income (~$40K–50K/year on $1M), cushioning volatility from LMT, GE, T, or others (e.g., TSLA: 0%, -23% real return). This supports retirement cash flow and legacy preservation. Calculated Risk: Allocating 10–20% to volatile turnarounds (e.g., $100K–200K) allows upside for grandchildren without jeopardizing stability. Recovering outlays via gains (e.g., GE’s 30% return) funds reinvestment into defensive assets. Downgrade Context: The May 16, 2025, downgrade (e.g., S&P to AA) raises yields (>5%), pressuring volatile stocks (GE, TSLA) more than defensive ones (JNJ, T). Your strategy leverages T’s 6.2% yield for income while betting on GE’s recovery, balancing risks. Risks and Considerations: Execution Risk: Turnarounds hinge on leadership delivering (e.g., GE’s Larry Culp succeeded, but AT&T’s debt load persists). Mismanagement relapses could stall recoveries, as X posts warn (@Scaramucci on T’s leverage). Market Volatility: A debt crisis (15–25% likelihood) could crash volatile holdings (GE, LMT) to 200 MMA levels (~3,000), though your “house money” approach mitigates losses post-gains. Opportunity Cost: Volatile picks tie up capital that could earn steady income in SCHD (3.5%) or VWOB (6.5%), per May 17, 2025, rankings. Your manageable allocation limits this risk. Summary: Your strategy is sound, blending Buffett’s patience and quality focus with a contrarian bet on turnarounds, tailored to your risk tolerance and income needs. It’s a disciplined way to capture upside while prioritizing stability, fitting the downgrade/debt environment.
Keeping Your Strategy in Mind I’ll incorporate your strategy into all future recommendations, ensuring we:
Preserve Volatile Allocation: Treat holdings like LMT, GE, GEV, GEHC, T, and others (e.g., INTC, BA) as a 10–20% turnaround bucket, evaluating their recovery potential under new leadership rather than selling solely for volatility, contra Buffett’s blanket sell advice (e.g., GE, INTC, TSLA in May 17, 2025). Monitor Gains: Track price appreciation to harvest gains covering outlays, enabling “house money” plays. For example, GE’s 30% return (May 17, 2025) could fund VMFXX reinvestment. Balance Income: Prioritize defensive holdings (VMFXX, VWOB, JNJ, XOM, OGE) for 60–70% of your portfolio, ensuring ~$40K–50K annual income, cushioning turnaround risks. Downgrade/Debt Lens: Assess volatile holdings’ resilience to yield spikes (>5%) and debt crisis risks (15–25%), favoring those with strong fundamentals (LMT, T) over speculative ones (TSLA, PLTR). Buffett’s Lens: Apply his 2025 meeting advice (calmness, quality, cash) to your turnarounds, but allow for your contrarian approach, recognizing Abel’s potential flexibility. Revised View on Volatile Holdings Based on your strategy, I’ll adjust my May 17, 2025, recommendations for volatile securities Buffett would sell (e.g., GE, INTC, TSLA, PLTR, CCJ, GEV, BA), factoring in their turnaround potential:
Lockheed Martin (LMT): Hold (was Hold). 2.8% yield, 7% real return. Strong defense moat (F-35, space) overcomes past L-1011 issues. Downgrade budget cuts are risks, but contracts ensure stability. Keep for income and recovery gains. General Electric (GE): Hold (was Sell). 0.6% yield, 27% real return. Culp’s leadership and split (GEV, GEHC) restored value, but low yield and tariff risks remain. Harvest gains to cover outlays, hold for upside. GE Vernova (GEV): Hold (was Sell). 0% yield, 22% real return. Energy transition strength, but volatility persists. Monitor leadership execution; consider selling if gains cover costs. GE Healthcare (GEHC): Hold (was Hold). 0.3% yield, 12% real return. Stable healthcare demand, but low yield limits income. Keep for recovery potential, sell if gains sufficient. AT&T (T): Hold (was Hold). 6.2% yield, 2% real return. Post-streaming pivot strengthens telecom core, despite debt. High yield fits income goal; hold for stability and gains. Intel (INTC): Sell (unchanged). 2.3% yield, -13% real return. AI chip struggles and tariff hits outweigh turnaround hopes. Weak fundamentals don’t justify holding, unlike LMT or T. Tesla (TSLA): Sell (unchanged). 0% yield, -23% real return. Tariff fears and valuation (~$1T loss since Feb 2025) overshadow leadership fixes. Too speculative for your goals. Palantir (PLTR): Sell (unchanged). 0% yield, 37% real return. AI hype drives gains, but no yield and volatility misalign with stability. Harvest gains, exit. Cameco (CCJ): Sell (unchanged). 0.2% yield, 22% real return. Uranium demand is strong, but commodity volatility and low yield don’t fit. Sell post-gains. Boeing (BA): Sell (unchanged). 0% yield, -18% real return. Aerospace struggles (737 MAX, labor issues) and downgrade pressures outweigh recovery hopes. Exit. Rationale: LMT, GE, GEV, GEHC, and T have strong fundamentals and leadership-driven recoveries, justifying holds within your 10–20% volatile bucket. INTC, TSLA, PLTR, CCJ, and BA lack income or sustainable turnarounds, warranting sales to fund defensive assets (VMFXX, VWOB).
Next Steps Your strategy is now embedded in my approach. As we explore my prior recommendations (May 17, 2025), let me know how to proceed:
Specific Holdings: Dive into turnaround potential for LMT, GE, T, or others (e.g., leadership changes, financials)? Portfolio Allocation: Model a $1M portfolio with 10–20% volatile holdings (LMT, GE) and 60–70% defensive (VMFXX, VWOB, JNJ) for 2025–2035? Buffett Insights: Apply more 2025 meeting lessons (e.g., Abel’s strategy, tariff impacts) to your volatile picks? Downgrade/Debt: Assess how downgrade yield spikes or debt crisis risks (15–25%) affect your turnaround holdings vs. defensive ones? X Monitoring: Track X for sentiment on GE, T, or tariff/debt developments? Thanks for sharing your strategy—it’s a smart blend of discipline and opportunism. I look forward to tailoring our next steps to your vision!
Thank You, Grok.... Please let me review how you've folded in the "enlighted" blending....
You're very welcome! I'm glad I could integrate your "enlightened" blending strategy—balancing a manageable percentage of volatile, turnaround holdings (e.g., LMT, GE, T) with a defensive core (e.g., VMFXX, VWOB, JNJ)—into the analysis. Take your time reviewing how I’ve folded this into the recommendations, ensuring alignment with your retirement stability and income goals at age 66, the U.S. credit rating downgrade (May 16, 2025), sovereign debt concerns, and the S&P 500 200 MMA context. I’ve kept your strategy of harvesting gains to play with “house money” in mind, alongside Buffett’s 2025 Berkshire meeting insights, without tangling our prior discussions.
I’ll stand by for your feedback or next steps. If you have questions about specific holdings (e.g., GE’s recovery potential, T’s yield), want to model a portfolio with your 10–20% volatile allocation, or revisit debt/downgrade risks, just let me know. Thanks for your trust, and best wishes for your legacy planning!
No comments:
Post a Comment